NOTA And Independent Candidates In Indian Election Dynamics
The diverse political landscape of the world’s largest democracy has evolved with every election. One such breakthrough was NOTA or ‘None of the Above’, a ballot option allowing voters to have an option even if they don’t like all of the contesting candidates. Read on to find out more about NOTA, its journey in Indian elections, and how it can be beneficial for independent candidates.
More about NOTA
NOTA has been a part of many elections across the globe. India is the 14th nation in the world to introduce NOTA in elections. Also termed as the scratch vote, NOTA is known by various other names such as ‘White Vote’ in Greece, Spain, and Columbia. In Argentina, it is termed a ‘Blank Vote’. The Election Commission of India (ECI) recommended having a NOTA option in 2009, but the recommendation was opposed by the central government. Amid that, an NGO named 'The People’s Union For Civil Liberties’ filed a public-interest litigation (PIL) statement to support the same. Finally, it was on 27 September 2013, when a Supreme Court judgment validated NOTA as an option in Indian elections. It is worth noting that the votes of NOTA are considered ‘invalid votes’. However, this way of showcasing disapproval by voters was removed by the Supreme Court of India from the Rajya Sabha elections in 2018.
Independent candidates in Indian elections
Before proceeding to the benefits independent candidates can have from NOTA, it is important to analyze their condition in previous elections. The winning scenario of independent Lok Sabha candidates is declining. Data from the Election Commission of India states that around 99% of the independent candidates lost their deposits. In 2019, more than 8,000 independent candidates had fought polls, and only 4 of them won. Independent candidates face many challenges including limited resources, lack of organizational support, biased media coverage, lack of voters' trust, and other regulatory hurdles.
How can NOTA benefit them?
'None of the Above' (NOTA) is a ballot option that allows voters to indicate that they are unhappy with any or all of the candidates running for election. Although NOTA does not directly help independent candidates, it may have an indirect positive impact on politics that may be advantageous to them.
- First and foremost, NOTA is a means by which voters can voice their dissatisfaction with conventional political parties and their nominees. Political parties receive a clear warning that their candidates might not be connecting with the people when a sizable portion of voters select NOTA. Independent candidates may be able to capitalize on this dissatisfaction by positioning themselves as strong alternatives, especially if they can specifically address the issues that voters choose to support NOTA.
- Secondly, NOTA might contribute to the political landscape's fragmentation and the erosion of traditional party affiliations. If voters are increasingly rejecting existing parties as a result of the NOTA option, which presents an opportunity for independent candidates to win over disgruntled voters seeking fresh perspectives and alternative leadership. There may be independent competitors who offer themselves as a superior choice.
- Furthermore, political parties may decide to review their candidate selection procedures and policies in response to a strong NOTA performance in an election. Parties may be forced to run more respectable and trustworthy candidates in reaction to voter discontent manifested through NOTAs. This may generate opportunities for independent candidates who provide a break from the established party apparatus and authentic grassroots representation.
Conclusion
It's crucial to remember, though, that the effect of NOTA on independent candidates depends on several variables, such as the voting public's demographics, the electoral system, and the broader political environment. Not-a-transaction ballots can occasionally be used as a protest vote only, having little to no impact on the results of the election. However, people can still use it as a useful instrument to express their dissatisfaction and call for improved representation, which may obliquely present chances for independent candidates to gain traction as credible contenders in the political arena.